What is modernism to me. (a draft, please).

Of Modernism I sigh.

“We have grown accustomed to speak offhandedly
of ‘modern literature,’
of the ‘modern temper,’
and even of
‘the modern,’
but until recently we have not made much effort to
the meaning of this term that we find so

Modernism interprets the world.
It (the -ism) says this world is primarily disordered, chaotic,
fragmented, and in dire need of
a historical tune-up.

Modernism says the world
needs order and imposes cartesianism on it
(more -isms), making machines
and systems and
the dichotomous determiners of human subjectivity.

Modernism knows too much of the world
too much of -isms
too much of freedom
and too much of tradition
and sometimes claims it is discontinuous
when it refers to Helen of Troy.

Modernism argues that the world
and we’re all gonna DIE anyway,
so we should just sit down and suck our –isms,
Or at our very most opulent least perceive that what jazz we’re sucking
is only an -ism.

A modern poet spews his (and maybe her) -isms
to MAKE it NEW
nothing is good save the NEW
no ideas but in things
juxtapositional allusions
just raw soundwords
madonnas in jars
violets and white flowers
balding quick-witted womanizers
and virulent goat’s-blood-speckled rocks.
Behind their dicta
is the same thing that poets always have behind them.

A greeny flower.
A woman’s thigh.
A fruit or nut.
A sudden light.
Another poem.

They claim modernity.
They profess modernism.

Whatever that is.

[1] Ellman, Richard, and Charles Feidelson, eds. Preface. The Modern Tradition. New York: Oxford UP, 1965. v-ix. Print.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s